Email Alert | RSS    帮助

中国防痨杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (11): 953-957.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6621.2014.11.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

低剂量CT在继发性肺结核治疗后随访中的应用价值

俞新华 黎惠如 汪福康 冯惠勇 李蔚宇   

  1. 510095 广州市胸科医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2014-04-29 出版日期:2014-11-10 发布日期:2014-12-05
  • 通信作者: 俞新华 E-mail:zhuyu3311@qq.com

The value of low dose CT in the follow-up of secondary pulmonary tuberculosis

YU Xin-hua, LI Hui-ru, WANG Fu-kang, FENG Hui-yong, LI Wei-yu   

  1. Department of Radiology, Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Guangzhou 510095, China
  • Received:2014-04-29 Online:2014-11-10 Published:2014-12-05
  • Contact: YU Xin-hua E-mail:zhuyu3311@qq.com

摘要: 目的 探讨在肺结核长期随访CT检查中应用低剂量扫描的价值。方法 搜集广州市胸科医院继发性肺结核患者治疗后于2012年1月至2013年6月例行随访检查的患者140例,采用随机数字表的方法,选择其中70例行低剂量CT扫描(低剂量组),70例行常规剂量CT扫描(常规剂量组)。对两组的CT图像质量进行评分(分别针对组织器官边缘、组织间密度差别、图像伪影、图像噪声共计 4项标准进行评分,每项标准满分为1分,每例患者满分为4分)。并记录两组的辐射剂量容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP)。然后分别在不对比前片和对比前片的2种情况下书写CT诊断报告,分析比较2次诊断报告的变动情况,并进行评分(影像描述和诊断结论均未发生变动得4分;影像描述部分有变动,而诊断结论无变动得3分;影像描述和诊断结论均发生变动,但主要诊断结论无变动,则得2分;影像描述和诊断结论均发生变动,且有部分主要诊断结论发生变动,则得1分;主要诊断结论完全不一样,则得0分)。通过t检验,比较两组在图像质量评分、诊断报告变动评分、辐射剂量方面差异是否有统计学意义,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果 低剂量组和常规剂量组的图像质量评分分别是(3.268±0.463)分、(3.507±0.448)分;诊断报告变动评分分别是(2.929±0.983)分、(3.186±0.952)分;辐射剂量的CTDIvol分别是(10.417±1.190)mGy、(19.214±1.956)mGy,DLP分别是(94.514±13.844)mGy×cm、(177.129±17.048)mGy×cm。两组的图像质量评分和辐射剂量的CTDIvol、DLP方面差异均有统计学意义(t=3.106,P=0.002;t=32.149,P<0.001;t=31.474,P<0.001);在诊断报告变动评分方面差异无统计学意义(t=1.572,P=0.118)。结论 低剂量CT能显著降低辐射剂量,且对于诊断报告无显著影响;低剂量CT应该成为肺结核治疗后随访检查中CT检查的常规应用模式。

关键词: 结核, 肺/放射摄影术, 体层摄影术, X线计算机, 辐射剂量, 随访研究

Abstract: Objective Discussion on the application value of low dose CT in pulmonary tuberculosis with long-term follow-up examination. Methods Routine follow-up CT scaned 140 anti-TB treated patients with se-condary pulmonary tuberculosis from 2012 January to 2013 June in Guangzhou Chest Hospital, 70 cases of low dose CT scanning (observation group) and 70 cases of routine dose CT scanning (control group). Scored the CT image quality of 2 groups according to 4 standards (edge of tissue or organ, tissue density difference, image artifact and image noise), each standard score 1 points, each patient out of 4 points. Recorded the radiation dose (CTDIvol, DLP) in 2 groups. Write CT diagnosis reports in the 2 case of contrast front piece and the front piece. Analysis and comparison of the changes in 2 diagnostic reports, and scores (Image description and diagnosis conclusion had not changed for 4 points. Image description partly changed and the diagnosis conclusion without change for 3 points. When image description and diagnosis conclusions have changes, the main diagnosis conclusion haven’t changes, it is 2 points while main diagnostic conclusion partly change it is 1 point. The main diagnosis conclusion completely changed for 0 points). To judged if there are significant differences in image quality score, changes score of diagnosis report and radiation dose by t test. Results In observation group and the control group, their image quality score were (3.268±0.463) and (3.507±0.448); changes score of diagnosis report were (2.929±0.983) and (3.186±0.952); radiation dose of CTDIvol were (10.417±1.190)(mGy) and (19.214±1.956)(mGy), DLP were (94.514±13.844)(mGy×cm) and (177.129±17.048)(mGy×cm), respectively. The two groups had significant difference in image quality score and radiation dose CTDIvol and DLP(t=3.106,P=0.002;t=32.149,P<0.001;t=31.474,P<0.001), had no significant difference in changes score of diagnosis report(t=1.572,P=0.118). Conclusion Low dose CT can significantly reduce the radiation dose, and has no obviously effect for the diagnosis report. Low dose CT scanning might become a routine application of model CT check follow-up after treatment of tuberculosis.

Key words: Tuberculosis, pulmonary/radiography, Tomography, X-ray computed, Radiation dosage, Follow-up studies